Below are my notes from TEA ELA Director Victoria Young's presentation at TCTELA. I have tried to clean them up but they aren't perfect. I was typing with my iPad balanced on my lap. :)
Go here and scroll to the bottom for the Power Point presentation that accompanied this presentation: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/writing/
Notes from Victoria
Young TCTELA Presentation
Short Answer
*All students must
understand what constitutes a credible idea in response to a question.
*An idea represents
the quality and depth of thinking and understanding
Idea for a score 3 is perceptive,
coherent, discerning and clearly analytical
Idea for a score 2 is
reasonable and specific; goes beyond literal reading
Literal reading WILL
BE a score 1
Score 1 lacks
explanation or specificity usually it is "sort of" a reasonable idea
but too general to know if it is valid
Score 0 is not
answered, outside boundaries of text, flat wrong or too vague or unclear to
determine reasonableness of idea
Text Evidence
The whole purpose of
text idea is to prove that your idea is valid. It substantiates the reader's
ideas and reflects the degree to which the reader can connect his ideas to the
pieces of text that BEST support that idea... they aren't just looking for
support but also well-chosen support
Students struggle with questions like "find the similarity"
because it greatly limits the text evidence they can choose... perhaps we are doing students a disservice
when we state they are right if they can support... maybe we need to focus more
on sometimes there is only one right answer?
New prompt page
design... Graphic at top (either a row of triangles, diamonds or boxes) of each
prompt... the corresponding answer document will have the same graphic at the
top. This is meant to decrease confusion as to which pages to write their
essays.
VY said students need to know that 1 means very limited, 2 means basic, etc. Said any student writing on a level 1 or even 2 in HS is "in trouble"
She shared distribution of essays across state:
March Essay State Score Distributions
English I Expository
Score 2-11%
Score 3-13%
Score 4-28%
Score 5-20%
Score 6-17%
Score 7-6%
Score 8- 3%
English I Literary
Score 2-7%
Score 3-9%
Score 4-37%
Score 5-24%
Score 6-17%
Score 7-4%
Score 8-9%
December English I Retest Score Distribution
English I Expository
Score 2-30%
Score 3-22%
Score 4-33%
Score 5-9%
Score 6-3%
Score 7-1%
Score 8-0%
English I Literary
Score 2-7%
Score 3-9%
Score 4-37%
Score 5-24%
Score 6-17%
Score 7-4%
Score 8-1%
December passing rate: Ballpark is 40% at Level 2
Observations about use of space in essays:
- Ineffective
- Intros
that repeat prompt, incorporate an unnecessary framing device or include
preview statements (5-9 lines)
- Conclusions
that simply repeat intro
- use
of filler
- Sentences that do not improve the quality of the idea
- Unnecessary, inappropriate or disruptive rhetorical
questions or questions that directly address the reader- persuasive
writing sometimes lends itself to these but they are being overused and
used ineffectively in all forms of writing
Reminders- Literary Writing
- Literary
piece must be a story, but students have latitude in determining how to
respond to the prompt
- Can
be based on real or imagined people
- must
be narrowly focused
- can
be written from any POV- 1st, 2nd, or 3rd
- Should
not include extraneous details- anything that does not further the readers
understanding of the core of the story itself- they always weaken
the plotline
- Judicious
use of literary strategies and devices is important
- Two
examples:
- Description can be effective but too much can cause
disruptions in the story line
- Ditto with dialogue especially since it takes up so
much space when working within 26 lines
- In
the literary prompt there will never be a pronoun just a general idea...
they do this so that students can know they can go in any direction
Reminders- Expository
- The
essay must be responsive to both the purpose and the topic. Many try to
use a narrative framing device which is not very effective. They are
trying to explain their thinking and then reflecting on their thinking and
it just isn't working. Or they are picking marginal ideas to explain which
are off topic but related to the topic... causes an issue.
- Essays
are weakened by inappropriate or marginally appropriate organizing
structure
- Inclusion
of extraneous ideas weakens the essay
- An
outside audience is implicit in the prompt, they should assume they are
writing for an educated adult audience but their job is NOT to persuade
them simply to explain
- Concerning
thesis- must be explicit and specific and the earlier in the paper, the
better. (Change from previous VY
statements)
- Any
pronoun is okay (1st, 2nd and 3rd) as long as students are explaining.
Even a shift can be okay although students are doing this throughout the
essays and isn't generally ideal.
- Students
are trying write on ideas that are complicated or abstract for their
writing skills- how to shift them to
write about what they understand?
- Ideas
and development can be based on students own lives/experience and on their
knowledge of the world and modern culture BUT development is most
effective when it is based on what they TRULY know.
- Lack
of transitions and reliance on perfunctory transitions (1st, 2nd, 3rd)
which effects development- a roadblock to substance/depth/thoughtfulness
because writer does not build from one idea to the next
- Clusters
of ideas that link to the prompt but not to one another- important in all
cases but esp if ideas are different "grain" sizes (pretty much described Bernabei's
strategy as NOT GOOD)
Reminders- Persuasive Prompts
- EOC
prompts will focus on issues that are relevant to teenagers but don't
require them to bring in background knowledge or facts in order to have a
good essay
- student
MUST center their paper around a clear position
- students
not required to address other side, make concessions or counterargument
but can if they want to but they only have 26 lines
- It
is not so much the breadth of the argument as the depth- students need to
think of the writing space (26 lines) when planning their approach
- VY
continues to advocate a narrow focus because they don't have the space for
both deep and wide
- Specific
examples are necessary to support a position. Ideas should be ordered to
maximize their persuasiveness
- can
use ethos, pathos, logos or a combination
- NO
FALSE EVIDENCE- statistics, quotes, anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment